<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paper: Early Experiences with Personal Health Records.  J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:1-7.</title>
	<link>http://ixcenterblog.org/archives/262</link>
	<description>Engaging consumers with information therapy (Ix) and HIT</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PCHIT Personas: Regional Policy - CA, MA, NY &#124; Patient Centered Health Information Technology (PCHIT)</title>
		<link>http://ixcenterblog.org/archives/262#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>PCHIT Personas: Regional Policy - CA, MA, NY &#124; Patient Centered Health Information Technology (PCHIT)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ixcenterblog.org/archives/262#comment-102</guid>
		<description>[...] Consumer access to personal health data somewhat mirrors provider access in that theoretical access exists for many consumers, but few are making use of that functionality. Many of Boston’s large providers have also launched personal health record (PHR) corollaries to their EHRs. However, among the practice settings studied, adoption among consumers remains under 10% of the eligible population. The first and most active PHR, CareGroup&#8217;s PatientSite, currently has approximately 35,000 active consumer users, according to a recent JAMIA study. Penetration is difficult to judge because the study does not indicate the potential eligible patient population. (see: Early Experiences with Personal Health Records) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Consumer access to personal health data somewhat mirrors provider access in that theoretical access exists for many consumers, but few are making use of that functionality. Many of Boston’s large providers have also launched personal health record (PHR) corollaries to their EHRs. However, among the practice settings studied, adoption among consumers remains under 10% of the eligible population. The first and most active PHR, CareGroup&#8217;s PatientSite, currently has approximately 35,000 active consumer users, according to a recent JAMIA study. Penetration is difficult to judge because the study does not indicate the potential eligible patient population. (see: Early Experiences with Personal Health Records) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Upsides of Virtual Medicine &#124; Patient Centered Health Information Technology (PCHIT)</title>
		<link>http://ixcenterblog.org/archives/262#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>The Upsides of Virtual Medicine &#124; Patient Centered Health Information Technology (PCHIT)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ixcenterblog.org/archives/262#comment-101</guid>
		<description>[...] practice of patient-centered care supplemented by technology that is going on in integrated and progressive non-integrated care systems. This was the feature of the Los Angeles Times article, which highlighted a colleague of mine, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] practice of patient-centered care supplemented by technology that is going on in integrated and progressive non-integrated care systems. This was the feature of the Los Angeles Times article, which highlighted a colleague of mine, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
